Journal

Thursday
Sep152011

BrandFinance® Global 100 Brands 2011 - September Update

01.09.2011

Economic crisis causes $6.3 trillion of intangible assets value to be lost since January 2011, according to Brand Finance plc.

 

  • The Brand Finance plc. Global Intangible Financial Tracker League Table (GIFT) is a 10 year study of the intangible asset values of all public stock exchanges worldwide
  • GIFT is released in January each year but due to the exceptional economic conditions it has been updated as of 24th August 2011
  • Further panic in world stock markets has resulted in a 25% ($6.3 tn) reduction in intangible asset values.
  • Despite the fall recorded in GIFT, an update of the Brand Finance Global 100 brands shows that there has only been a 2.4% drop in their combined value

 

Financial service brands hit hardest

Tougher legislation, sluggish activity in the corporate market and ongoing fears regarding exposure to sovereign debt has meant banking and insurance brands have suffered. Bank brands in the top 100 have lost $25.9bn from their total brand value (7%) since January 2011.

HSBC has become the world’s most valuable bank brand keeping a steady position at 10. Bank of America experienced a brand value fall of $5.3bn taking it down to position 14. Likewise Wells Fargo saw a 12% reduction in brand value and Santander also slipped back in the league table with a reduction of $3.3bn.

Insurance brands saw a drop of 6% with AXA fairing worst, with a loss of $1.6bn brand value taking them out of the top 50 global brands.

 

Sparking technology industry

The economic crisis has not led to a blanket reduction in brand value. Technology and electronics brands are prospering with Google, Apple and Microsoft taking the top 3 positions in the league table. Apple has increased its value by 33%, making it a more valuable brand than Microsoft for the first time.

 

Established economies

The total brand value for the 46 US headquartered brands declined 2% from January. US brands dependent on their home market suffered bigger losses than global brands including McDonald’s, Nike and Coca-Cola who all improve their position in the league table.

Japanese brands dropped 3% as a result of the tsunami disrupting business. Europe has also felt the pressure with Spanish brands down 13% and France 5%, both are exposed to issues within the financial services sector.

 

Developing countries

In contrast, emerging economies including China, India and South Korea all show strong performances. In China the total brand value increased with two new brands entering the top 100; PetroChina and China Life Insurance Company. Argricultural Bank of China increased brand value by $1.5bn, rising from 99 to 71 in the league table.

Samsung is another notable performer, increasing the value of its brand to $26.6bn (up 24%). The South Korean company has not experienced the supply chain disruptions by their Japanese competitors and is developing a stronger hold on both the TV and smart phone markets. Similarly in India TATA moved up the league table with a new brand value of $14.8 bn at position 41 (previously 50). 

 

David Haigh, CEO of Brand Finance plc, comments:

“As stock markets around the world falter, we are seeing a drop in the amount of intangible value global businesses hold and the value of the individual brands. The dramatic shifts that can be seen since the BrandFinance® Global 500 launched earlier this year illustrate how vital it is for businesses to track the value of their brands. Even the world’s biggest businesses are not immune to change.” 

 

Additional insights

  • Coca-Cola has reversed the decline noted in BrandFinance® Global 500 and is now the 11th most valuable brand. This shift creates a greater lead over its longstanding rival, Pepsi ($19.1bn / 25th).
  • The automotive sector has also performed well in the last six months, with crisis-plagued Toyota re-entering the top 10 with a value of $28.8 bn.  
  • In Europe, Germany maintained a steady position, underpinned by a stable economy and strong auto industry including brands BMW, Mercedes Benz and Volkswagen. The UK saw two additional brands enter the top 100; BP and BT. 
Thursday
Sep152011

Amazon Is 2011's #1 Loyalty Leader

 by Karlene Lukovitz,

Monday, September 12, 2011, 8:00 AM, MediaPost NEWS
 

Brand Keys' new, 2011 Customer Loyalty Leaders Index shows Amazon having displaced Apple's iPhone in the #1 spot.

2011 Top 10 Loyalty Leaders

BrandCategory20112010
Amazon online retail 1 7
Apple smartphone 2 1
Facebook social network 3 N/A
Samsung cell phone 4 2
Apple computer 5 5
Zappos online retailer 6 N/A
Hyundai automotive 7 6
Kindle e-reader 8 N/A
Patron tequila 9 N/A
Mary Kay cosmetics 10 20

 

"Brand loyalty has always been primarily driven by emotion," points out Brand Keys founder and President Robert Passikoff, adding that this year's rankings again demonstrate that "consumers seek to emotionally connect with brands that actually stand for something, and to connect with each other, too."

Other highlights from this year's results, based on Brand Keys' tracking of 528 total brands across 79 categories, via surveying of consumers who have identified themselves as buyers of products within the categories:

  • Among the brands showing the largest jumps in ranking: Starbucks (now at #100 vs. #452 last year); Skechers (#99 vs. #388); Ford (#86 vs. #323); and Overstock.com (#91 vs. #241).
  • Among the brands showing the largest losses in ranking: Nokia (now #84 vs. #21 last year); BlackBerry (#60 vs. #9); Chanel cosmetics (#74 vs. #51); Eucerin moisturizer (#46 vs. #23); True Value (#76 vs. #55); and Three Olives Vodka (#43 vs. #25).
  • The 10 lowest-ranked brands among all 528 tracked in 2011 (#s 528 through 519, in order): Borders, American Apparel, Taco Bell, NHL, Tylenol (OTC allergy), BP, Friendster, Budweiser, Dr. Pepper and Bank of America.
  • Beauty brands (cosmetics, moisturizers, teeth whiteners, hair color, shampoo) account for 16 of the top 50 (32%) and 23 of the top 100 loyalty leaders.

Beyond Mary Kay at #10 (up 10 positions vs. 2010), cosmetics leaders include Maybelline (#14, up two); Estee Lauder (#27, down eight); Clinique (#34, down 12); Avon (#36, down nine); L'Oreal (#37, down five); Max Factor (#40, up 12) and Cover Girl (#47, unchanged). Lancome is the leader both in luxury cosmetics (#31, down three), and the luxury facial moisturizers (#48, down seven).

Leaders in other beauty categories: teeth whiteners, Crest Whitestrips (#11, new to list); hair color, L'Oreal (#18, up 13); facial moisturizers, Mary Kay (#28, down eight); skin moisturizers, Eucerin (#46, down 23); shampoos, Suave (#72, new to list, and the only shampoo in the top 100).

  • Technology brands account for 20% of the top 50 -- down a bit since last year. Three social networks (a category added this year) were in the top 25. In addition to Facebook at #3, Twitter and LinkedIn came in at #20 and #24, respectively.

Tech brands with multiple products making the rankings include Samsung (computers at #44, smartphones at #57, HDTV at #80, in addition to cell phones at #4) and Apple (computers at #5, as well as the iPhone smartphone at #2).

Kindle rules among e-readers (#8, new to list, vs. #52 Nook, also new to list); and Google rules among search engines (#16, up five, vs. runner-up Bing at #30, down 15).

AT&T and Verizon are the only wireless providers in the top 100, respectively at #79 (up 32) and #93 (down 14).

  • Retail brands account for 16% of the top 50 -- about the same percentage as last year, although many declined in their rankings this year. This, suggests Brand Keys EVP brand development Amy Shea, likely reflects retailers struggling to differentiate themselves on more than price in a still-struggling economy.

In addition to Amazon, retailers in the top 50 include online retailer Zappos (#6, new to the list); Wal-Mart (#13, down 10 positions vs. 2010), J. Crew (#21, down eight); Target (#33, down seven); Sam's Club (#38, down nine), Kohl's (#44, unchanged) and BJ's (#50, down seven).

  • Alcohol brands account for 12% of the top 50 -- again, the same as in 2010. No beer brand made it into the top 50 this year (although Sam Adams ranked #58). Among spirits in the top 50, Patrón tequila led the pack (#9, new to list), followed by Grey Goose vodka (#15, down 11 positions); Ketel One (#17, down three); Don Julio tequila (#29, new to list); Sauza tequila (#41, new to list); Three Olives vodka (#43, down 18) and Stolichnaya vodka (#45, down 10). Further down within the top 100, Chopin vodka is #51 (up 14); Rain vodka #63 (down 18); Ciroc #65 (up a notable 50); Skyy vodka #69 (up one) and Jose Cuervo tequila #81 (new to list).
  • Among automotive brands, only Hyundai made the top 50 (#7, down one position), and only three made the top 100.

Toyota dropped to #59 from #37, but given its recalls and the effects of Japan's tsunami and the economy, it could have been significantly worse, observes Passikoff. The brand's strong historic loyalty performance came into play in the form of the "Loyalty Rule of Six" (loyal consumers are six times more likely to give a brand the benefit of the doubt in uncertain circumstances), he says.

The third automotive brand in the top 100, as noted, is Ford, with its 237-position leap to #86.

  • Food/beverage and restaurant brands are relatively scarce within the top 100.

Dunkin' Donuts again won the coffee battle -- up two positions, to #12. Second-place McDonald's coffee lost eight positions, to rank #26. As noted, Starbucks coffee leaped 352 positions, but at #100, is still a distant third in loyalty terms.

Frosted Flakes is the highest-ranking kids' breakfast cereal (#35, down 11), followed by Lucky Charms (#67, unchanged) and Wheaties (#82, down four). Among adult cereals, Cheerios (#77, unchanged) and Special K (#83, up 13) made the top 100.

Two QSRs made the top 100: Domino's Pizza (#89, up 29) edged out McDonald's (#90, up 19).

The Brand Keys index rankings are based on interviews of adults 18 to 65, drawn from the nine U.S. Census regions, self-selected for the categories in which they are consumers. Seventy-five percent were interviewed by phone, 20% face-to-face, and the remainder online. According to Brand Keys, the model and rankings are 100% consumer-driven and are independently validated, predictive leading indicators of brand and corporate profitability.

Wednesday
Sep142011

What's in store for private label

Retailer brands threaten national competition

By Stephanie Hildebrandt
September 12, 2011, Beverage Industry

 

Trans

Sam’s Club offered a private-label seasonal juice drink, Member’s Mark Blackberry Flavored Lemonade from concentrate.

 

We’ve heard of blind taste tests between competitive products. Oftentimes, consumers can’t tell the difference between a national brand and its private-label equivalent. However, in recent years, retailers have taken it to a whole new level. These days, consumers might find it difficult to pick out a private label product on-shelf because of the way it’s packaged and marketed.

Retailers are getting more sophisticated, says Richard Haffner, head of beverages global research at Euromonitor International, Chicago. Private label has been prevalent in Canada and Europe for a long time. Until the Millennium, the United States’ private label sector was lagging behind, he explains.

“[Canada and Europe] oftentimes had different tiers to their private label,” Haffner says. “There was an economy and then a more premium type of product. I think in the U.S., you’re beginning to see that with a lot of retailers.”

The recession might have boosted the private label sector, but its rebound won’t cause the end of its success, according to The Nielsen Co., New York.

According to “Private Label Manufacturers Association’s (PLMA) 2011 Private Label Yearbook,” prepared by Nielsen, annual private label sales increased 39 percent in supermarkets and 97 percent in drug stores during the past decade. Last year, private label sales grew nearly 2 percent in total outlets, comprised of U.S. supermarkets, drug stores and mass merchandisers, including Walmart. Overall, sales were $88.5 billion for the year, which Nielsen says is an all-time high. That does not include channels such as warehouse clubs, limited assortment stores, convenience stores and dollar stores, which would add an estimated $15 to $20 billion in private label sales for the year, the research firm states.

According to the report, there was evidence of extreme efforts by national brand marketers in 2010 to recapture some of the market share they lost to private label brands in recent years. In supermarkets, for instance, national brands were down 0.1 percent in year-to-year dollar sales, while unit sales were up 1 percent. To keep unit sales up, national brands employed promotional spending and short-term price cuts, even if it meant digging into dollar sales, the report notes.

“In the recent downturn, brands have had to work harder and have had more promotions, so the trend [toward private label] has been interrupted and even reversed in some markets,” says Richard Hall, founder and chairman of Zenith International, Bath, U.K.

Although private label sales are still strong, they’re not seeing the double-digit increases from 10 years ago.

“Since the end of 2008, store brand share growth across food, drug and mass [merchandise] has been fairly flat as brands stepped up their promotional support and innovation efforts and some retailers took on a ‘build it and they would come’ strategy,” said Todd Hale, senior vice president of consumer and shopper insights at Nielsen in the company’s blog. “Today, national brands still command 78 percent of [consumer product good] unit sales.”

But private label brands do have the potential to innovate and grow, Euromonitor’s Haffner says.

“Private label in the U.S. tends to be more ‘me too’ products and not really getting a lot of innovation there,” he says. “They’re creating marketing departments and trying to market their trademarks in their stores a lot more. I do think that as retailers gain in sophistication in the future and become more marketers, you might start to see some innovation.”

Currently, some of the strongest private label beverage categories are bottled water, powdered beverage concentrates and 100 percent juice, Haffner says. Bottled water and 100 percent juice are commodity-based categories, so the price of the product becomes more important, he says. Powdered beverage concentrates is a category that’s sold on value.

According to SymphonyIRI Group, Chicago, in the 52 weeks ending July 10, in supermarkets, drug stores, mass merchandisers, club stores, gas and convenience stores, excluding Walmart, U.S. dollar sales for national branded bottled water products totaled $4.9 billion, while private label bottled water dollar sales totaled nearly $1.3 billion. Using the same qualifications, national branded bottled juices totaled $3.8 billion, while private label totaled $666.6 million.

Store brand stigma

Consumers aren’t necessarily purchasing private-label products only for the value aspect anymore. According to market research companies, private label’s reputation has changed.

Consumers used to view private label brands as those geared toward people on tight budgets who are unable to afford “the best,” Nielsen’s Hale said in his blog. “Nielsen research shows that three-quarters of consumers believe store brands are a good alternative to name brands, and two out of three agree that quality is also on par.”

“Private label brands are overcoming the stigma once associated with ‘generic’ products,” said Fiona O’Donnell, senior analyst at Mintel, Chicago, in a statement. “Even though the recession has ended and consumers may be in a better position financially to return to name brands, it’s likely that many will continue to buy store brand staples that are of equal quality.”

In fact, 44 percent of grocery shoppers believe store brand products are of better quality today than they were five years ago, according to Mintel research. Thirty-nine percent of respondents who identify themselves as the primary grocery shopper of their household say they would recommend a store brand product. Thirty-four percent say they don’t believe they’re giving anything up, such as flavor or prestige, by using store brands. Furthermore, only 19 percent believe it’s worth paying more for national brand products.

However, in the beverage industry, these statistics change depending on the category. For instance, in the soft drinks category, national brands have worked to build brand equity, keeping many consumers from even considering private label soft drinks.

“When you go over to carbonates, I believe Coke and Pepsi have done a very good job over the years of establishing their brands and what people expect from it, and private label’s not as strong in carbonates,” Euromonitor’s Haffner says.

But that doesn’t mean private label beverages can’t adapt. Although many retailers are competing with national brands, some are offering unique and innovative varieties. Save-A-Lot, Earth City, Mo., recently introduced a soft drink called Mountain Holler Red Howl, which is a citrus-flavored beverage with a taste of cherry.

Additionally, Safeway, Pleasanton, Calif., launched a line of Refreshe flavored waters in Raspberry Acai, Pomegranate Acai Blueberry, Cranberry Raspberry and Strawberry and Kiwi varieties. The waters are calorie-, sodium- and caffeine-free and enhanced with vitamins B3, B5 and B12.

Bentonville, Ark.-based Sam’s Club offered a seasonal juice drink, Member’s Mark Blackberry Flavored Lemonade from concentrate. This summer, the club store sold two 96-ounce bottles for $4.48, according to Mintel’s Global New Products Database.

Last year, Austin-based Whole Foods Market stores introduced the first private label refrigerated organic almond milk under its 365 Organic Everyday Value brand, the company says.

“For those seeking organic quality at everyday low prices, we are introducing value twin packs to pass on even more savings to our shoppers,” said Chris Slick, senior global coordinator for exclusive and store brands for Whole Foods Market, in a statement.

Some of the strong private label brands are the upper-tier store brands where retailers are offering a quality product for a good price, Haffner says. He notes that private label products are getting more competitive in the ready-to-drink tea segment.

“[The RTD tea segment] has grown a lot, so it’s becoming a much larger segment [that is] able to attract the attention of private label,” he says.

For the 52 weeks ending July 10, national brands of canned and bottled tea totaled nearly $1.3 billion while private label brands of canned and bottled tea totaled $34.5 million, according to SymphonyIRI Group, in supermarkets, drug stores, mass merchandisers, club stores, gas and convenience stores, excluding Walmart.

“Lower pricing has been the single biggest driver [for private label beverages],” says Zenith International’s Hall. “Other factors have been improving quality, quick response innovation and intelligent segmentation. The latest steps have been in the expansion of in-house brands.”

This summer, Fresh & Easy, El Segundo, Calif., introduced a line of private label coffee in multiple varieties.

“[The introduction of the new line] makes private label look like national brands by offering a wide range of items,” said Jonathon Asher, senior vice president of Perception Research Services, in a June 2011 article on Beverage Industry’s sister publication PL Buyer’s website, privatelabelbuyer.com.

The coffee line consists of Donut Shop coffee, a Fair Trade blend, whole bean blends and trial size blends in a variety of flavors, including Cinnamon and Hazelnut, the article states.

Earlier this year, Deerfield, Ill.-based Walgreens stores launched the private label beer brand Big Flats 1901, supplied by the Winery Exchange. Comparable in taste and quality to the top-selling national brand beers, Big Flats 1901 is available in cans in six-packs for $2.99 and 24-packs for $11.49, the company says. The beer is made with six-row barley malt, corn grits, hops from Yakima Valley and bottom fermenting yeast, it adds. This summer, the brand expanded with a Light variety, also retailing for $2.99 a six-pack.

“As far as trends in [private label] beer, we are experiencing explosive growth in the private label beer portfolio, most significantly in craft beer and premium domestic cans,” says Jennifer Verdon, public relations and marketing coordinator at the Winery Exchange. “Some of our established brands, like Tap Room 21 with Kroger, are now standalone brands in the eyes of the consumer. This brand was launched in 2007 and has seen tremendous growth. For some of our new programs including Buck Range with Supervalu and Barrel Trolley with Harris Teeter, we are delivering to an underserved market and see customers eager to accept these private label brands.”

Barrel Trolley craft beer retails for $7.99 a six-pack and is available in Amber Ale, Pale Ale and Belgian White varieties.

“Consumers are initially drawn to our price points and innovative packaging designs,” she says. “It is the superior quality that keeps them coming back for more.”

Crunching the numbers

A pricing study conducted by PLMA discovered that consumers can save more than 35 percent, on average, off of their grocery bills by opting for the retailer’s brands. The study looked at a range of basic food and non-food items that an average family might put on its summer shopping lists and compared store brands versus national brands. Consumers can save as much as 50 percent on cola, according to the study. The typical national brand unit price for cola is $1.58 while the typical store brand unit price is $0.79, it adds.

According to the “PLMA 2011 Private Label Yearbook,” shoppers who reached for the store brand version of their favorite products rather than the national brand in all U.S. outlets enjoyed an estimated $28 billion in savings in 2010.

In total outlets, including U.S. supermarkets, drug stores and mass merchandisers, including Walmart, annual private label sales have increased by $4.5 billion, or 5 percent, during a three-year period, Nielsen’s report states. Retail sales were $84 billion in 2008 and $88.5 billion in 2010. Similarly, the annual store brand units have increased by $1.5 billion, or 4 percent, from $38.6 billion in 2008 to $40.1 billion in 2010, it adds.

When comparing 2010 to 2009, however, there was less activity. Sales of store brands in total outlets were up $1.5 billion, or

1.8 percent, in 2010 compared to 2009. Private label dollar share rose by 0.4 points to 17.4 percent and unit share stayed flat at 21.8 percent.

Although the economic downturn opened the door for private label, Euromonitor’s Haffner doesn’t expect it to falter as the economy recovers.

“Private label’s a high-quality product and the quality of it has improved over the years,” Haffner explains. “As people may have gone to the product because of price, they found that there isn’t that much of a quality difference from the branded players. So I don’t expect they’ll decline much as the economy improves.” BI

Wednesday
Sep142011

Loblaws gambles on luxury food line

Image

A shopper leaves a Loblaws store in St. Eustache, Que., in this  file photo.

RYAN REMIORZ/THE CANDIAN PRESS

Valet parking, celebrity chefs and bacon marmalade will be on the menu at an exclusive dinner party to launch Canada’s first super-premium supermarket brand.

Loblaw Cos. Ltd., the country’s largest grocery chain and long-time leader in private brands, is introducing President’s Choice Black Label, featuring products normally found in specialty gourmet stores.

To give the brand immediate cachet, President’s Choice is launching the line at a dinner party on Thursday, Sept. 22.

Billed as an epicurean adventure, the company has commissioned some of the city’s best-known chefs -- Marc Thuet, Bertrand Alépée and Anthony Walsh, as well as pastry chefs Bobette & Belle -- to create a tasting menu based on the products.

To be held in the avant garde art gallery, Neubacher Shor Contemporary, in Toronto’s Parkdale neighbourhood, the guest list includes a who’s who of 40 to 50 food writers, influencers and media.

From the smoky bacon marmalade, to the crumbly eight year old cheddar, to the cherry shiraz fruit jelly, Loblaw hopes the line will also appeal to ordinary consumers with a sense of culinary adventure despite the current challenging economic times.

“We’ve always seen a market for premium items even in tough economic times. A number of specialty stores have come into the market in the last couple of years,” said Ian Gordon, vice-president Loblaw Brands Ltd.

“We look at this is as a bit of affordable indulgence. They may not be able to afford a trip to Italy. But they can experience it,” said Allan Lindsay, Loblaw’s vice-president marketing.

Priced from $1.99 to $24.99, they’re meant to sell for less than in specialty gourmet stores. The bacon marmalade, for example, is priced at $4.99 for a 370 ml jar.

The line is scheduled to begin appearing the first week of October in 140 select Loblaw stores in select neighbourhoods in Ontario and Quebec.

Starting with 200 items, the group will represent a niche product amid Loblaw’s private label line, from its value priced No Name brand to its PC organics specialty segment.

In the stores, the Black Label products will be supported by displays that tell their story, how they were sourced, from whom, and how they might be used to transform an ordinary meal into a masterpiece, Lindsay said.

Reaching back into its past, Loblaw isn’t using the words “Black Label” on its packaging, but rather letting the packaging speak for itself. On a plain black background, the label features high end photos and a few simple descriptive words.

“It goes back to our first successful controlled brand product in a yellow and black package with no name on it. It wasn’t until six years later that we actually put “No Name” on the packaging,” Gordon explained.

While Loblaw is the first to offer a premium in house food product in Canada, British food retailer Tesco has been doing so for some time, said Jeff Doucette, a principal in the consulting firm Sales Is Not Simple.

Adding them to Loblaw’s existing portfolio of private label brands “will have a huge positive halo effect on the brand overall, whether they sell well or not, initially,” Doucette said.

TV food shows and specialty magazines have boosted demand for specialty food products previously unavailable at the supermarket, Doucette noted.

“You get the Food and Drink magazine from the LCBO and it’s asking for something unique like this and it’s an extra stop. Now, I don’t need to go anywhere else to get these things,” he said.

And while many debt-laden consumers are trying to cut their household spending, the brand is positioned as better value for money, he noted.

“Yes, there’s a debt crisis in Greece. But if this truffle aioli whipped dressing is cheaper at Loblaws than at my favourite gourmet store, I don’t have to give up great tasting food, just because I’m a little over-invested in European mutual funds,” he said.

The market for private label food in Canada is $11.4 billion a year, according to the Nielsen company. Loblaw’s share is $8.2 billion.

Tuesday
Sep132011

The Power of Strong Brands on Category Health

Tuesday, Sep 13, 2011

CPG Loyalty: Sports Drinks Among Strongest
by Karlene Lukovitz, Yesterday, 3:03 PM, Media Post News



Power-Drinks-

 

Despite the economy and the growth of private label, brand loyalty has increased in 45 of the top 100 CPG categories over the past three years, according to a new report from SymphonyIRI Group.  

Some -- like sports drinks -- have seen significant gains. Between 2008 and 2010, the percentage of consumers who reported being loyal to a sports drink brand rose by 6.5 percentage points, to 87.6%.

The definition of brand loyalty: More than 50% of the buyer's total purchasing in the category is of a single brand (not including private label).

Many of the categories showing the largest gains already had high loyalty percentages -- demonstrating that "true loyalty can survive even prolonged economic upheaval," says SymphonyIRI Times & Trends editor Susan Viamari.

Batteries gained 3.9 percentage points to reach a 73.5% loyalty level (as of July 3); cleaning tools/mops/brooms gained 2.8 to reach 72.4%; shelf-stable dinners gained 3.7 to reach 66.9%; shampoo gained 2.8 to reach 65.9%; cat and dog litter gained 2.5 to reach 62.2%; dry packaged dinners gained 3.2 to reach 59.3%; diapers gained 4.4 to reach 58.3%; and household cleaners gained 3.5 to reach 50.9%.

SymphonyIRI credits innovation as a major driver of the loyalty performance in many of these categories. For instance, during the three years, sports drink makers launched more than a dozen products that each generated more than $7.5 million in year-one sales.

In the diaper category, nine brands that achieved "New Product Pacesetter" status were launched. In fact, fewer consumers are loyal to private label diapers today than in 2008: down six points, to 18%. ("Private label loyalty" is defined as greater than 50% of the buyer's total purchasing in that category being private label.)

Categories showing the largest losses in brand loyalty include refrigerated salads/coleslaw (-22 points); gastrointestinal tablets (-11); cold/allergy/sinus tablets (-7.2); internal analgesics (-6.9); sugar (-6.5); pastry/doughnuts (-5.2); creams/creamers (-5.2); Mexican foods (-5.1); RTD tea/coffee (-4.9) and butter (-4.7).

Across all categories in which brand loyalty decreased most markedly, private label loyalty has increased. For instance, while brand loyalty in the salads/coleslaw category is still high (54%), private label loyalty has jumped by 19%, to 27%.

Private label loyalty levels exceed 50% in some categories viewed by consumers as largely undifferentiated, including butter (68.2%) and sugar (64.1%). When makers in these categories have to raise prices (butter and sugar prices have risen 22% and 13%, respectively, since 2008), brand loyalty drops and private label loyalty rises.

However, some categories have seen loyalty increases, or relatively small losses, despite double-digit percentage increases in price over the past three years. These include dish detergent (+1.8 points), chocolate candy (+1.3), frozen breakfast meals (+1.2) and razor blades (+0.3).

Conversely, across the 10 categories that showed the largest increases in percentage of dollars sold on deal (price promotions), six saw loyalty decline: toothbrushes, toothpaste, laundry detergents, women's sanitary products, skin care and processed frozen/refrigerated poultry. Categories that gained loyalty despite significant discount activity included eye/contact lens care, diapers, blades and soap.

Consistently competing on price "has significant negative impacts on brand equity," stresses John McIndoe, SVP, marketing for SymphonyIRI. "CPG leaders must harness the power of value ... CPG marketers are clearly getting this message."